Greggle

Greggle · Ways of thinking

Fourteen ways of thinking

None of them were invented here. That is the point.

These are the methods factories, consultancies and labs have used for decades, the ones normally locked inside textbooks and training courses. Each page says where the method came from, why it works, when to reach for it, and how to run it with a pen. Greggle lays the same method out on your board and walks you through it.

Start with what you are trying to do. Or, before any of them, the knowledge audit: fifteen minutes sorting what you know from what you believe. And after, the decision journal, for finding out whether you were right. Those two are Greggle’s own, and they are in the app as well as on paper.

Work out what is actually wrong

For a Problem. Something has gone wrong and you need the cause, not the symptom.

5 Whys

Toyota, 1950s

Ask why of the answer, five times, until you reach a cause you can actually act on.

Cause and Effect

Kaoru Ishikawa, 1960s

The fishbone. Go wide across every kind of cause before you go deep on one.

Theory of Constraints

Eliyahu Goldratt, 1984

Find the one place where the whole flow narrows, and serve it.

Break a big question into parts

For a Challenge, a Project or a Goal too large to see whole.

Issue Tree

McKinsey, 1960s

Split a question into parts that do not overlap and leave nothing out.

First Principles

Aristotle

Find the truths nothing else rests on, then build up from them alone.

Strategic Challenge Map

Greggle’s own synthesis

Categorise the challenges, evidence each one, judge what you can move.

Decide between options

For a Decision, or an Opportunity you have not yet said yes to.

Options and Criteria

Franklin, 1772

Write down what a good answer would have to do before you look at the answers.

Force Field Analysis

Kurt Lewin, 1940s

What is pushing for the change, what is holding it back, and which single restraint to remove.

Plan towards something

For a Project with an end, or a Goal without one.

Working Backwards

Amazon, 2000s

Define what done looks like and the evidence that would prove it, then walk back to now.

Objectives and Key Results

Intel, 1970s

One objective, and the numbers that would prove you reached it.

See what could go wrong

For a Risk, or any plan before it starts.

Pre-mortem

Gary Klein, 2007

It is twelve months from now and this failed. Work out why, then prevent it.

Scenario Planning

Shell, 1970s

Build four futures, decide what you would do in each, plant signposts.

Bring other people with you

For anything whose outcome depends on someone else.

Stakeholder and Influence Map

Freeman and Mendelow, 1980s

Who decides, who can block it, and what each of them actually wants.

Answer First

Barbara Minto, 1970s

Give the answer in the first sentence, reasons beneath. The consulting habit.

What Greggle suggests first, by the kind of thing you are working on

What the eleven kinds are, and how to tell which one you have.

a GoalKnowledge Audit, Pre-mortem, Working Backwards, Force Field Analysis, First Principles, Objectives and Key Results
a ProjectKnowledge Audit, Pre-mortem, Working Backwards, Theory of Constraints, Stakeholder and Influence Map, Strategic Challenge Map
a ChallengeKnowledge Audit, Strategic Challenge Map, Issue Tree, Stakeholder and Influence Map, Scenario Planning, First Principles, Answer First
a ProblemKnowledge Audit, 5 Whys, Cause and Effect, Issue Tree, Theory of Constraints, First Principles
a DecisionKnowledge Audit, Issue Tree, Options and Criteria, First Principles, Force Field Analysis, Pre-mortem, Answer First, Decision Journal
an OpportunityKnowledge Audit, Force Field Analysis, Options and Criteria, Scenario Planning, Stakeholder and Influence Map, Pre-mortem
a RiskKnowledge Audit, Pre-mortem, Cause and Effect, Force Field Analysis
a HabitKnowledge Audit, WOOP, If-then plans, Pre-mortem
a SkillKnowledge Audit, Deliberate practice, Feynman technique, Working Backwards
a ConversationKnowledge Audit, Ladder of inference, Three conversations, Stakeholder and Influence Map
a DocumentKnowledge Audit, SCQA, Answer First, Reverse outline

All fourteen are always there, and so are two of Greggle’s own: the knowledge audit, offered first whatever the kind, and the decision journal, last on a Decision. These are the ones the app puts at the top of the list, most apt first.

Pick one and try it on something real.

Greggle proposes the first cut and adds nothing until you have looked at it. No account, nothing leaves your device.

Open Greggle